Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

4.3k citations
869 papers · indexed · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Library Science and Information Literacy 304
    • Library Science and Administration 203
    • Web and Library Services 164
    • Library Collection Development and Digital Resources 108
    • Research Data Management Practices 30

Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

666 papers receiving 3.4k citations

Peers

Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Library and Information Sciences 1.5k
  • Information Systems 1.5k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 347
  • Medical Terminology 12
  • Communication 271
Replace Library journal with:
Library journal United States
Medical Reference Services Quarterly United States
Australian Academic & Research Libraries Australia
Science & Technology Libraries United States
Information Services & Use United States
Education for Information United Kingdom
Libri United States
Reference & User Services Quarterly United States
Collection Management United States
The Reference Librarian United States
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice relative to Library journal United States Library journal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×15×18×
Library journal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evidence Based Library and Information Practice more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice.

About Evidence Based Library and Information Practice

The 869 papers published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice usually cover Library and Information Sciences (361 papers), Information Systems (318 papers), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (12 papers), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (57 papers) and General Health Professions (171 papers) specifically the topics of Library Science and Information Literacy (304 papers), Library Science and Administration (203 papers), Web and Library Services (164 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (141 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (108 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (38 papers), Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (30 papers) and Research Data Management Practices (30 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Evidence Based Library and Information Practice are Virginia Wilson, Denise Koufogiannakis, Karen Davies, Margaret Sampson, Jessie McGowan, Carol Lefebvre, Amy J. Catalano, Alison Brettle, Jonathan D. Eldredge and Natasha Wiebe.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026