Countries where authors publish in Diabetes Therapy
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Diabetes Therapy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Diabetes Therapy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diabetes Therapy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Diabetes Therapy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Diabetes Therapy.
About Diabetes Therapy
The 1.6k papers published in Diabetes Therapy in the last decades have received a total of 24.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Diabetes Therapy usually cover Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (1.4k papers), Family Practice (53 papers) and Surgery (392 papers) specifically the topics of Diabetes Treatment and Management (1.0k papers), Diabetes Management and Research (919 papers), Metabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer (383 papers), Pancreatic function and diabetes (306 papers), Diabetes and associated disorders (231 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (142 papers), Diabetes Management and Education (138 papers) and Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment (101 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Diabetes Therapy are Sanjay Kalra, John Doupis, Κλεοπάτρα Αλεξιάδου, Marc Evans, Stephen C. Bain, H. Hanaire, Domingo Orozco‐Beltrán, Tatiana Dilla, David M. Williams and Thinzar Min.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.