Cytotechnology

2.8k papers and 45.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.8k papers published in Cytotechnology in the last decades have received a total of 45.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Cytotechnology usually cover Molecular Biology (1.7k papers), Genetics (399 papers) and Surgery (355 papers) specifically the topics of Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects (676 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (229 papers) and Virus-based gene therapy research (227 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cytotechnology are Alvin W. Nienow, Mohamed Al‐Rubeai, Geoffrey L. Francis, Kazumi Yagasaki, Satoshi Terada, Vijay Singh, Martin Clynes, Hasan Türkez, Hiroko Isoda and Michael Butler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cytotechnology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cytotechnology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cytotechnology.

Countries where authors publish in Cytotechnology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cytotechnology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cytotechnology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cytotechnology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025