Countries where authors publish in Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
This network shows the impact of papers published in Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.
About Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
The 921 papers published in Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics in the last decades have received a total of 5.7k indexed citations . Papers published in Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (509 papers), Internal Medicine (78 papers) and Surgery (643 papers) specifically the topics of Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (458 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (243 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (228 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics are Yuji Ikari, Yoshio Kobayashi, Yuichi Saito, Kengo Tanabe, Kiyoshi Hibi, Shinjo Sonoda, Jiro Aoki, Ken Kozuma, Takeshi Kimura and Kenichi Tsujita.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.