Current Psychology

8.4k papers and 75.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.4k papers published in Current Psychology in the last decades have received a total of 75.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Psychology usually cover Clinical Psychology (3.6k papers), Social Psychology (3.5k papers) and Sociology and Political Science (2.1k papers) specifically the topics of Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1.1k papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (769 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (724 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Psychology are Albert Mehrabian, Paschal Sheeran, Amanda Rivis, Adrian Furnham, Debra J. Vandervoort, Sarah R. Baker, Katarzyna Adamczyk, Gökmen Arslan, Jesus Alfonso D. Datu and Murat Yıldırım.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Current Psychology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Psychology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Psychology.

Countries where authors publish in Current Psychology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Psychology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Psychology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Psychology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026