Current Applied Physics

5.9k papers and 103.7k indexed citations

About

The 5.9k papers published in Current Applied Physics in the last decades have received a total of 103.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Current Applied Physics usually cover Materials Chemistry (3.2k papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (3.2k papers) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of ZnO doping and properties (692 papers), Conducting polymers and applications (473 papers) and Semiconductor materials and devices (410 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Current Applied Physics are C.D. Lokhande, Oh‐Shim Joo, Giusy Scalia, Jan P. F. Lagerwall, Deepak P. Dubal, Arnon Chaipanich, Takashi Minemoto, Bansi D. Malhotra, Soo‐Jin Park and J.K. Lee.

In The Last Decade

Current Applied Physics

5.7k papers receiving 100.3k citations

Countries where authors publish in Current Applied Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Current Applied Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Current Applied Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Current Applied Physics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Current Applied Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Current Applied Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Current Applied Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026