Critical Military Studies

231 papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 231 papers published in Critical Military Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Critical Military Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (140 papers), Gender Studies (116 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (91 papers) specifically the topics of Gender, Security, and Conflict (111 papers), Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (36 papers) and Global Security and Public Health (31 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Critical Military Studies are Joanna Tidy, Marsha Henry, Cynthia Enloe, Jenny Hedström, Maya Eichler, Harriet Gray, Kevin McSorley, Emily Gilbert, Zoë H. Wool and Marysia Zalewski.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Critical Military Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Critical Military Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Critical Military Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Critical Military Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Critical Military Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Critical Military Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Critical Military Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025