Costume
- Museology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- History
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts
- Topics
- Fashion and Cultural TextilesCrafts, Textile, and DesignHistorical Art and Culture Studies
In The Last Decade
Costume
151 papers receiving 294 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Museology 386
- Sociology and Political Science 204
- Economics and Econometrics 122
- History 112
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 96
Countries where authors publish in Costume
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Costume. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Costume with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Costume more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Costume
This network shows the impact of papers published in Costume. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Costume.
About Costume
The 386 papers published in Costume in the last decades have received a total of 737 indexed citations . Papers published in Costume usually cover Museology (222 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (58 papers) and History (47 papers) specifically the topics of Fashion and Cultural Textiles (206 papers), Crafts, Textile, and Design (60 papers) and Historical Art and Culture Studies (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Costume are J. H. Baker, Penelope J. Corfield, Maria Hayward, Hilary Davidson, David R. Wilcox, Valerie Steele, Caroline Evans, Roy C. Strong, Patricia L. Baker and Linda Young.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.