Contemporary Drug Problems

829 papers and 9.7k indexed citations

About

The 829 papers published in Contemporary Drug Problems in the last decades have received a total of 9.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Drug Problems usually cover Epidemiology (471 papers), General Health Professions (282 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (219 papers) specifically the topics of Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (376 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (157 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (145 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Drug Problems are Jürgen Rehm, Fiona Measham, Gerhard Gmel, Kathryn Graham, David Moore, Carol Bacchi, Ingeborg Rossow, Robin Room, Thomas K. Greenfield and Suzanne Fraser.

In The Last Decade

Contemporary Drug Problems

751 papers receiving 8.3k citations

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Drug Problems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Drug Problems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Drug Problems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Drug Problems more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Drug Problems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Drug Problems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Drug Problems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026