Contemporary Drug Problems

809 papers and 8.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 809 papers published in Contemporary Drug Problems in the last decades have received a total of 8.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Contemporary Drug Problems usually cover Epidemiology (458 papers), General Health Professions (273 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (213 papers) specifically the topics of Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (367 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (149 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (139 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Contemporary Drug Problems are Jürgen Rehm, Fiona Measham, Gerhard Gmel, Kathryn Graham, David Moore, Carol Bacchi, Ingeborg Rossow, Robin Room, Thomas K. Greenfield and Suzanne Fraser.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Contemporary Drug Problems

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Contemporary Drug Problems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Contemporary Drug Problems.

Countries where authors publish in Contemporary Drug Problems

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Contemporary Drug Problems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Contemporary Drug Problems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Contemporary Drug Problems more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025