Clinical Neuroscience Research

224 papers and 4.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 224 papers published in Clinical Neuroscience Research in the last decades have received a total of 4.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical Neuroscience Research usually cover Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (80 papers), Molecular Biology (72 papers) and Psychiatry and Mental health (63 papers) specifically the topics of Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (28 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (25 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (25 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Neuroscience Research are Eve K. Mościcki, Adrian J. Dunn, Helen Tager‐Flusberg, Serge Przedborski, Miquel Vila, Frauke Ohl, Harold A. Sackeïm, Monica J. Carson, J. Cameron Thrash and Barbara Walter.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical Neuroscience Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Neuroscience Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Neuroscience Research.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Neuroscience Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Neuroscience Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Neuroscience Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Neuroscience Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025