Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry

1.2k papers and 22.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry in the last decades have received a total of 22.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry usually cover Immunology (475 papers), Hematology (411 papers) and Molecular Biology (294 papers) specifically the topics of Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (249 papers), Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research (202 papers) and Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (199 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry are Brent L. Wood, Alberto Órfão, Jan W. Gratama, J. Philip McCoy, Sameena S. Khan, D. Robert Sutherland, Bruce H. Davis, Joseph A. DiGiuseppe, Andrea Illingworth and Júlia Almeida.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry.

Countries where authors publish in Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cytometry Part B Clinical Cytometry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025