Clinical and Molecular Hepatology

740 papers and 15.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 740 papers published in Clinical and Molecular Hepatology in the last decades have received a total of 15.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical and Molecular Hepatology usually cover Epidemiology (526 papers), Hepatology (491 papers) and Surgery (130 papers) specifically the topics of Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment (478 papers), Hepatitis B Virus Studies (181 papers) and Hepatitis C virus research (175 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical and Molecular Hepatology are Changik Jo, Seung‐Hoi Koo, Su Jong Yu, Ki Tae Suk, Dong Joon Kim, Grace Lai‐Hung Wong, Yasuko Iwakiri, Dong Ho Lee, Carlos J. Pirola and Ju Dong Yang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical and Molecular Hepatology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical and Molecular Hepatology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical and Molecular Hepatology.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical and Molecular Hepatology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical and Molecular Hepatology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical and Molecular Hepatology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical and Molecular Hepatology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025