Clinical and Experimental Optometry

2.9k papers and 33.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Clinical and Experimental Optometry in the last decades have received a total of 33.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Clinical and Experimental Optometry usually cover Ophthalmology (1.5k papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.0k papers) and Epidemiology (823 papers) specifically the topics of Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies (767 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (699 papers) and Corneal surgery and disorders (632 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical and Experimental Optometry are Nathan Efron, Charles W. McMonnies, Joanne M. Wood, Barry L Cole, Brian Brown, Robert C. Augusteyn, Mark Willcox, Pauline Cho, Richard A. Armstrong and Michael J. Collins.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Clinical and Experimental Optometry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical and Experimental Optometry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical and Experimental Optometry.

Countries where authors publish in Clinical and Experimental Optometry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical and Experimental Optometry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical and Experimental Optometry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical and Experimental Optometry more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025