Cleveland State law review

475 papers and 788 indexed citations i.

About

The 475 papers published in Cleveland State law review in the last decades have received a total of 788 indexed citations. Papers published in Cleveland State law review usually cover Political Science and International Relations (147 papers), Law (146 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (84 papers) specifically the topics of Legal Systems and Judicial Processes (89 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (53 papers) and Legal and Constitutional Studies (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cleveland State law review are David Wexler, Mary Romero, F. Hodge O'Neal, William C. Bailey, Frank L. Pasquale, Julian Webb, Phillip J. Resnick, Francis A. Allen, Irwin N. Perr and Todd J. Zywicki.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Cleveland State law review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cleveland State law review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cleveland State law review.

Countries where authors publish in Cleveland State law review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cleveland State law review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cleveland State law review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cleveland State law review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025