Cinta de moebio

450 papers and 1.6k indexed citations

About

The 450 papers published in Cinta de moebio in the last decades have received a total of 1.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Cinta de moebio usually cover Sociology and Political Science (173 papers), Education (137 papers) and General Social Sciences (84 papers) specifically the topics of Educational theories and practices (93 papers), Literary and Cultural Studies (77 papers) and Social Sciences and Policies (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Cinta de moebio are Carlos Eduardo Maldonado, Martín Retamozo, Tomás Ariztía, Aldo Mascareño, Adrián Scríbano, Júlio Mejía Navarrete, Felipe González, Émilie Raymond, Fernando Robles and Benjamín Arditi.

In The Last Decade

Cinta de moebio

307 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Fields of papers published in Cinta de moebio

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Cinta de moebio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Cinta de moebio.

Countries where authors publish in Cinta de moebio

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Cinta de moebio. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Cinta de moebio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Cinta de moebio more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026