This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Ceramics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Ceramics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ceramics more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Ceramics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Ceramics.
About Ceramics
The 576 papers published in Ceramics in the last decades have received a total of 3.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Ceramics usually cover Ceramics and Composites (188 papers), Orthodontics (41 papers), Building and Construction (78 papers), Materials Chemistry (248 papers) and Oral Surgery (36 papers) specifically the topics of Advanced ceramic materials synthesis (156 papers), Advanced materials and composites (79 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (64 papers), Nuclear materials and radiation effects (58 papers), Ferroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials (44 papers), Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production (43 papers), Dental materials and restorations (40 papers) and Concrete and Cement Materials Research (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Ceramics are Masao Tokita, Robert B. Heimann, Francesco Baino, Enrica Verné, Frank Kern, Abbas Rahdar, Elisa Fiume, Majid Minary‐Jolandan, Michael I. Ojovan and Virendra Kumar Yadav.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.