Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology

11.9k citations
878 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Ear Surgery and Otitis Media 88
    • Sinusitis and nasal conditions 57
    • Head and Neck Cancer Studies 42
    • Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 76

Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology

724 papers receiving 10.2k citations

Peers

Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
  • Otorhinolaryngology 2.6k
  • Sensory Systems 1.4k
  • Neurology 909
  • Surgery 2.9k
  • Speech and Hearing 437
Replace Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology with:
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology United States
European Annals of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Diseases France
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Canada
International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology Brazil
Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica Italy
Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology United States
Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia Brazil
Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery United States
Rhinology Journal United Kingdom
Neuroimaging Clinics of North America United States
Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology relative to Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology United States Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×55.6×
Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology.

About Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology

The 878 papers published in Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology in the last decades have received a total of 11.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology usually cover Otorhinolaryngology (187 papers), Sensory Systems (96 papers), Neurology (54 papers), Immunology and Allergy (25 papers) and Surgery (173 papers) specifically the topics of Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (88 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (76 papers), Sinusitis and nasal conditions (57 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (53 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (51 papers), Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (47 papers), Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (44 papers) and Head and Neck Cancer Studies (42 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology are Kyung Tae, Clark A. Rosen, Pavan S. Mallur, Marco Merlano, Nerina Denaro, Elvio Russi, Ritvik P. Mehta, Yong Bae Ji, Chang Myeon Song and Do Hyun Kim.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact