Countries where authors publish in Catalysis Communications
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Catalysis Communications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Catalysis Communications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Catalysis Communications more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Catalysis Communications
This network shows the impact of papers published in Catalysis Communications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Catalysis Communications.
About Catalysis Communications
The 6.7k papers published in Catalysis Communications in the last decades have received a total of 203.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Catalysis Communications usually cover Catalysis (2.2k papers), Process Chemistry and Technology (325 papers) and Inorganic Chemistry (1.3k papers) specifically the topics of Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (2.5k papers), Catalysis and Oxidation Reactions (1.4k papers), Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies (978 papers), Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (860 papers), Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis (816 papers), Catalysis for Biomass Conversion (804 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Reactions (786 papers) and Nanomaterials for catalytic reactions (723 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Catalysis Communications are Zhongbiao Wu, Yue Liu, Haiqiang Wang, Majid M. Heravı, Nazim Muradov, Keiichi Tomishige, Fatemeh F. Bamoharram, Vasant R. Choudhary, S. Sugunan and Khadijeh Bakhtiari.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.