Canadian acoustics

712 papers and 2.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 712 papers published in Canadian acoustics in the last decades have received a total of 2.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Canadian acoustics usually cover Speech and Hearing (177 papers), Biomedical Engineering (163 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (156 papers) specifically the topics of Noise Effects and Management (174 papers), Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (131 papers) and Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (129 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Canadian acoustics are David K. Mellinger, Raymond Panneton, G. Pernica, Murray Hodgson, Michael Wagner, M. Kathleen Pichora‐Fuller, Kyle Gorman, Christopher W. Clark, John S. Bradley and Alberto Behar.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Canadian acoustics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Canadian acoustics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Canadian acoustics.

Countries where authors publish in Canadian acoustics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Canadian acoustics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Canadian acoustics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Canadian acoustics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025