BMC Pediatrics

5.9k papers and 94.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.9k papers published in BMC Pediatrics in the last decades have received a total of 94.6k indexed citations. Papers published in BMC Pediatrics usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.8k papers), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (1.2k papers) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.1k papers) specifically the topics of Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (698 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (636 papers) and Child Nutrition and Water Access (568 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMC Pediatrics are Tanis R. Fenton, Jae Kim, Keith J. Barrington, Chris Feudtner, Matthew W. Gillman, Matt Hall, Dingwei Dai, James A. Feinstein, Wenjun Zhong and Ken Kleinman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMC Pediatrics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMC Pediatrics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMC Pediatrics.

Countries where authors publish in BMC Pediatrics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMC Pediatrics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMC Pediatrics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMC Pediatrics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025