BMC Molecular Biology

828 papers and 34.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 828 papers published in BMC Molecular Biology in the last decades have received a total of 34.9k indexed citations. Papers published in BMC Molecular Biology usually cover Molecular Biology (698 papers), Genetics (131 papers) and Cancer Research (105 papers) specifically the topics of RNA Research and Splicing (189 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (122 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (107 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMC Molecular Biology are Nicholas Silver, Jie Jiang, Swee Lay Thein, Steve Best, Gloria V. Callard, Amy McCurley, Wolfram Menzel, Marcus Gassmann, Ruediger Salowsky and Michael J. Leiber.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMC Molecular Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMC Molecular Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMC Molecular Biology.

Countries where authors publish in BMC Molecular Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMC Molecular Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMC Molecular Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMC Molecular Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025