BMC Developmental Biology

996 papers and 39.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 996 papers published in BMC Developmental Biology in the last decades have received a total of 39.0k indexed citations. Papers published in BMC Developmental Biology usually cover Molecular Biology (737 papers), Genetics (195 papers) and Cell Biology (164 papers) specifically the topics of Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation (177 papers), Congenital heart defects research (118 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (86 papers). The most active scholars publishing in BMC Developmental Biology are Tomoko Watanabe, Chyuan‐Sheng Lin, Thomas M. Jessell, Frank Costantini, Yasuto Tanabe, Shankar Srinivas, Anna‐Katerina Hadjantonakis, Phillip A. Newmark, Stephen A. Duncan and R. King.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in BMC Developmental Biology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in BMC Developmental Biology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in BMC Developmental Biology.

Countries where authors publish in BMC Developmental Biology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in BMC Developmental Biology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in BMC Developmental Biology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites BMC Developmental Biology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025