Blätter der DGVFM

556 papers and 1.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 556 papers published in Blätter der DGVFM in the last decades have received a total of 1.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Blätter der DGVFM usually cover Economics and Econometrics (201 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (110 papers) and General Health Professions (95 papers) specifically the topics of Insurance and Financial Risk Management (134 papers), Probability and Risk Models (95 papers) and Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management (84 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Blätter der DGVFM are Erhard Kremer, Jan M. Hoem, Freddy Delbaen, Christian Hipp, Werner Hürlimann, Hansjörg Albrecher, Hans Richter, Ralf Korn, Klaus D. Schmidt and Peter Albrecht.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Blätter der DGVFM

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Blätter der DGVFM. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Blätter der DGVFM.

Countries where authors publish in Blätter der DGVFM

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Blätter der DGVFM. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Blätter der DGVFM with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blätter der DGVFM more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025