Biomaterials Research

632 papers and 16.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 632 papers published in Biomaterials Research in the last decades have received a total of 16.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Biomaterials Research usually cover Biomedical Engineering (306 papers), Biomaterials (169 papers) and Molecular Biology (138 papers) specifically the topics of Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (126 papers), Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics (89 papers) and Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications (85 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biomaterials Research are Insup Noh, Yong Kiel Sung, Gopinathan Janarthanan, Jin Hyun Lee, Sung Wan Kim, Nathaniel S. Hwang, Hoon-Sang Sohn, Jong‐Keon Oh, S-W. Kim and Chan Yeong Heo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Biomaterials Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biomaterials Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biomaterials Research.

Countries where authors publish in Biomaterials Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biomaterials Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biomaterials Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biomaterials Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025