Countries where authors publish in Behavioural Pharmacology
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Behavioural Pharmacology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Behavioural Pharmacology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Behavioural Pharmacology more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Behavioural Pharmacology
This network shows the impact of papers published in Behavioural Pharmacology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Behavioural Pharmacology.
About Behavioural Pharmacology
The 3.0k papers published in Behavioural Pharmacology in the last decades have received a total of 64.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Behavioural Pharmacology usually cover Behavioral Neuroscience (348 papers), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.7k papers) and Biological Psychiatry (148 papers) specifically the topics of Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (1.3k papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (713 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (436 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (382 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (348 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (332 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (188 papers) and Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (169 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Behavioural Pharmacology are Irwin Lucki, Brady Reynolds, R.J. Rodgers, Paul Willner, Frank Sams‐Dodd, Jane Stewart, Aldo Badiani, Ronald S. Duman, Heath D. Schmidt and D. J. Sanger.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.