Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics

137.3k citations
3.9k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Protein Structure and Dynamics
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
    • Enzyme Catalysis and Immobilization
    • Enzyme Production and Characterization

Papers in

    • Protein Structure and Dynamics 544
    • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms 205
    • Biochemical and Molecular Research 186
    • Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 163
    • Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism 160

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics

3.9k papers receiving 134.4k citations

Peers

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics
Comparison fields: 5 of 219
  • Molecular Biology 80.0k
  • Biotechnology 6.6k
  • Cell Biology 11.3k
  • Biochemistry 5.1k
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 1.7k
Replace Biomolecules with:
Biomolecules United States
Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin Japan
Current Medicinal Chemistry Italy
Methods United States
Toxicology Letters United States
ACS Chemical Biology United States
Biochimie France
Toxicology United States
Current Pharmaceutical Design United States
Current Opinion in Chemical Biology United States
Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics relative to Biomolecules United States Biomolecules's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.2×
Biomolecules · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics.

About Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics

The 3.9k papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics in the last decades have received a total of 137.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics usually cover Molecular Biology (2.8k papers), Biochemistry (229 papers), Cell Biology (508 papers), Biotechnology (245 papers) and Clinical Biochemistry (112 papers) specifically the topics of Protein Structure and Dynamics (544 papers), Enzyme Structure and Function (526 papers), RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (205 papers), Hemoglobin structure and function (196 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (186 papers), Enzyme Production and Characterization (169 papers), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (163 papers) and Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (160 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics are Vladimir N. Uversky, Anne H. Delcour, Michael J. Davies, Bożena Kamińska, Sharon M. Kelly, Nicholas C. Price, Matthew Biancalana, Shohei Koide, Thomas J. Jess and A. Keith Dunker.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact