Australian aboriginal studies

562 papers and 3.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 562 papers published in Australian aboriginal studies in the last decades have received a total of 3.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Australian aboriginal studies usually cover Anthropology (179 papers), Health (154 papers) and Geography, Planning and Development (91 papers) specifically the topics of Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights (152 papers), Australian Indigenous Culture and History (97 papers) and Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Australian aboriginal studies are Lawrence Bamblett, Beth Gott, Alan Watchman, Michael Dodson, Martin Nakata, Gillian Cowlishaw, Geoffrey Gray, Allan Marett, Nicolas Peterson and Deborah Bird Rose.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Australian aboriginal studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Australian aboriginal studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Australian aboriginal studies.

Countries where authors publish in Australian aboriginal studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Australian aboriginal studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Australian aboriginal studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Australian aboriginal studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025