Countries where authors publish in Astronomy Letters
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Astronomy Letters. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Astronomy Letters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Astronomy Letters more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Astronomy Letters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Astronomy Letters.
About Astronomy Letters
The 1.9k papers published in Astronomy Letters in the last decades have received a total of 11.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Astronomy Letters usually cover Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.7k papers), Instrumentation (277 papers), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (369 papers), Oceanography (129 papers) and Geophysics (95 papers) specifically the topics of Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (762 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (491 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (465 papers), Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (371 papers), Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (353 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (339 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (277 papers) and Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (263 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Astronomy Letters are В. В. Бобылев, R. Sunyaev, A. T. Bajkova, А. В. Моисеев, E. V. Pitjeva, A. Lutovinov, V. L. Afanasiev, Yu. A. Nagovitsyn, Б. В. Сомов and Н. Н. Чугай.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.