Arts Education Policy Review

804 papers and 5.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 804 papers published in Arts Education Policy Review in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Arts Education Policy Review usually cover Music (451 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (404 papers) and Education (279 papers) specifically the topics of Diverse Music Education Insights (449 papers), Art Education and Development (389 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (90 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Arts Education Policy Review are Daniel T. Willingham, Liora Bresler, Elliot W. Eisner, Lori A. Custodero, José Luis Aróstegui Plaza, Chad West, Kenneth Elpus, Tracie Costantino, Ellen Winner and Lois Hetland.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Arts Education Policy Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Arts Education Policy Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Arts Education Policy Review.

Countries where authors publish in Arts Education Policy Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Arts Education Policy Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Arts Education Policy Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arts Education Policy Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025