ACS Applied Nano Materials

11.4k papers and 160.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 11.4k papers published in ACS Applied Nano Materials in the last decades have received a total of 160.6k indexed citations. Papers published in ACS Applied Nano Materials usually cover Materials Chemistry (6.5k papers), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (4.3k papers) and Biomedical Engineering (3.1k papers) specifically the topics of Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques (1.3k papers), Gas Sensing Nanomaterials and Sensors (890 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (819 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACS Applied Nano Materials are M. A. Cotta, Nikhil R. Jana, T. Randall Lee, Riddhiman Medhi, Suryasarathi Bose, Jyotirmoy Deb, Utpal Sarkar, Aritra Biswas, Dolores Ortiz and Omar K. Farha.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ACS Applied Nano Materials

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACS Applied Nano Materials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACS Applied Nano Materials.

Countries where authors publish in ACS Applied Nano Materials

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACS Applied Nano Materials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACS Applied Nano Materials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACS Applied Nano Materials more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025