Annals of Coloproctology

650 papers and 4.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 650 papers published in Annals of Coloproctology in the last decades have received a total of 4.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Annals of Coloproctology usually cover Surgery (487 papers), Oncology (390 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (134 papers) specifically the topics of Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (306 papers), Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes (177 papers) and Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas (125 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Annals of Coloproctology are Nam Kyu Kim, Young Wan Kim, Gyu‐Seog Choi, Jin Cheon Kim, Hye Jin Kim, In Ja Park, Djamila Boerma, Jae Hwan Oh, Chang Sik Yu and Ik Yong Kim.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Annals of Coloproctology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Annals of Coloproctology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Annals of Coloproctology.

Countries where authors publish in Annals of Coloproctology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Annals of Coloproctology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Annals of Coloproctology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annals of Coloproctology more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025