Countries where authors publish in Advances in Surgery
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in Surgery more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in Surgery.
About Advances in Surgery
The 375 papers published in Advances in Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Advances in Surgery usually cover Surgery (231 papers), Emergency Medicine (45 papers) and Gastroenterology (22 papers) specifically the topics of Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (54 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (44 papers), Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management (25 papers), Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (25 papers), Gastrointestinal disorders and treatments (22 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (22 papers), Hernia repair and management (19 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (19 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in Surgery are Karen Richards, Angela M. Ingraham, Clifford Y. Ko, Bruce L. Hall, Taylor S. Riall, Charles M. Balch, Tait D. Shanafelt, Δημήτριος Δημητριάδης, Donald J. Lucas and Timothy M. Pawlik.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.