Acta Neuropsychiatrica

1.3k papers and 13.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Acta Neuropsychiatrica in the last decades have received a total of 13.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Neuropsychiatrica usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (446 papers), Clinical Psychology (247 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (242 papers) specifically the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (161 papers), Bipolar Disorder and Treatment (156 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (143 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Neuropsychiatrica are Brian E. Leonard, Michael Berk, Gin S. Malhi, Søren Dinesen Østergaard, Gregers Wegener, Jim Lagopoulos, Michaël Maes, Milan Dragović, Ziggi Ivan Santini and Belinda Ivanovski.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Neuropsychiatrica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Neuropsychiatrica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Neuropsychiatrica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Neuropsychiatrica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Neuropsychiatrica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Neuropsychiatrica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Neuropsychiatrica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025