Acta Agrobotanica

1.4k papers and 5.3k indexed citations

About

The 1.4k papers published in Acta Agrobotanica in the last decades have received a total of 5.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Agrobotanica usually cover Plant Science (1.3k papers), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (299 papers) and Molecular Biology (224 papers) specifically the topics of Agriculture, Plant Science, Crop Management (439 papers), Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (428 papers) and Flowering Plant Growth and Cultivation (168 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Agrobotanica are Elżbieta Weryszko‐Chmielewska, Krystyna Piotrowska-Weryszko, Bożena Denisow, Renata Nurzyńska-Wierdak, Mirosława Chwil, Aneta Sulborska, Małgorzata Stpiczyńska, Małgorzata Wrzesień, T. Kowalski and Aleksandra Głowacka.

In The Last Decade

Acta Agrobotanica

1.0k papers receiving 4.9k citations

Fields of papers published in Acta Agrobotanica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Agrobotanica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Agrobotanica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Agrobotanica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Agrobotanica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Agrobotanica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Agrobotanica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026