Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica

3.1k papers and 51.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.1k papers published in Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica in the last decades have received a total of 51.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica usually cover Molecular Biology (2.0k papers), Cancer Research (546 papers) and Immunology (381 papers) specifically the topics of Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research (218 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (207 papers) and RNA modifications and cancer (206 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica are Jilie Kong, Shaoning Yu, Xiaoling Li, Ting‐Jun Fan, Jin Liang, Lihui Han, Zhengping Xu, Xiaohua Yan, Ye‐Guang Chen and Ziying Liu.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica.

Countries where authors publish in Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025