University of Minnesota

222.8k papers receiving 10.1M citations

Peers

University of Minnesota
Comparison fields: 5 of 252
  • Molecular Biology 1.4M
  • Transplantation 52.2k
  • Clinical Psychology 408.8k
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 233.0k
  • Ecology 467.2k
Replace University of Wisconsin–Madison with:
University of Wisconsin–Madison United States
University of Chicago United States
Washington University in St. Louis United States
University of Iowa United States
University of Michigan United States
Northwestern University United States
University of Illinois Chicago United States
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign United States
The Ohio State University United States
University of Manitoba Canada
University of Minnesota relative to University of Wisconsin–Madison United States University of Wisconsin–Madison's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2×2.4×
University of Wisconsin–Madison · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing scholars working at University of Minnesota

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research produced by authors working at University of Minnesota. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers produced at University of Minnesota with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites University of Minnesota more than expected).

Fields of papers published by authors at University of Minnesota

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers affiliated with University of Minnesota at the time of their publication. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers affiliated with University of Minnesota at the time of their publication.

About University of Minnesota

In recent decades, authors affiliated with University of Minnesota have published 247.4k papers, which have received a total of 11.1M indexed citations . Scholars at this organization have produced 1.5k papers in Transplantation, 29.6k papers in Molecular Biology, 7.6k papers in Clinical Psychology, 4.1k papers in Hematology and 9.9k papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health on the topics of Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (2.2k papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (2.0k papers), Plant and animal studies (2.0k papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (2.0k papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (1.9k papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (1.8k papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (1.8k papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (1.6k papers). Their work is cited by papers focused on Molecular Biology (1.4M citations), Transplantation (52.2k citations), Clinical Psychology (408.8k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (233.0k citations) and Ecology (467.2k citations). Authors at University of Minnesota collaborate with scholars in United States, China and Canada and have published in prestigious journals including PLoS ONE, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Journal of Chemical Physics and Blood. Some of University of Minnesota's most productive authors include Donald G. Truhlar, David Tilman, Yan Zhao, Peter B. Reich, Christopher J. Cramer, David R. Jacobs, Georgios B. Giannakis, Ann S. Masten, Frank S. Bates and Aaron R. Folsom.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore institutions with similar magnitude of impact