Assignment methods: matching\nbiological questions with appropriate\ntechniques

594 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2005, received 594 indexed citations. Written by Stéphanie Manel and Oscar E. Gaggiotti covering the research area of Genetics, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Genetics (408 citations), Ecology (275 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (172 citations). Published in Insecta mundi.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w9945779 →

Countries where authors are citing Assignment methods: matching\nbiological questions with appropriate\ntechniques

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Assignment methods: matching\nbiological questions with appropriate\ntechniques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Assignment methods: matching\nbiological questions with appropriate\ntechniques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Assignment methods: matching\nbiological questions with appropriate\ntechniques more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Assignment methods: matching\nbiological questions with appropriate\ntechniques

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Assignment methods: matching\nbiological questions with appropriate\ntechniques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Assignment methods: matching\nbiological questions with appropriate\ntechniques.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w9945779.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026