Connectionist Speech Recognition: A Hybrid Approach
Impact in
Classified as
- Authors
- Hervé BourlardNelson Morgan
- Journal
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9889299 →Countries where authors are citing Connectionist Speech Recognition: A Hybrid Approach
This map shows the geographic impact of Connectionist Speech Recognition: A Hybrid Approach. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Connectionist Speech Recognition: A Hybrid Approach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Connectionist Speech Recognition: A Hybrid Approach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Connectionist Speech Recognition: A Hybrid Approach
This network shows the impact of Connectionist Speech Recognition: A Hybrid Approach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Connectionist Speech Recognition: A Hybrid Approach.
About Connectionist Speech Recognition: A Hybrid Approach
This paper, published in 1993, received 806 indexed citations . Written by Hervé Bourlard and Nelson Morgan covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (721 citations), Signal Processing (596 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (109 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (25 citations) and Human-Computer Interaction (16 citations). Published in Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9889299.