The Importance of Small Planktonic Copepods and Their Roles in Pelagic Marine Food Webs
- Authors
- Jefferson T. Turner
- Journal
- Zoological studies
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9802337 →Countries where authors are citing The Importance of Small Planktonic Copepods and Their Roles in Pelagic Marine Food Webs
This map shows the geographic impact of The Importance of Small Planktonic Copepods and Their Roles in Pelagic Marine Food Webs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Importance of Small Planktonic Copepods and Their Roles in Pelagic Marine Food Webs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Importance of Small Planktonic Copepods and Their Roles in Pelagic Marine Food Webs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The Importance of Small Planktonic Copepods and Their Roles in Pelagic Marine Food Webs
This network shows the impact of The Importance of Small Planktonic Copepods and Their Roles in Pelagic Marine Food Webs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Importance of Small Planktonic Copepods and Their Roles in Pelagic Marine Food Webs.
About The Importance of Small Planktonic Copepods and Their Roles in Pelagic Marine Food Webs
This paper, published in 2004, received 613 indexed citations . Written by Jefferson T. Turner covering the research area of Ecology and Oceanography. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oceanography (454 citations), Ecology (299 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (243 citations). Published in Zoological studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9802337.