Business Fixed Investment Spending: Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications
- Authors
- Bob Chirinko
- Journal
- Journal of Economic Literature
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9712961 →Countries where authors are citing Business Fixed Investment Spending: Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications
This map shows the geographic impact of Business Fixed Investment Spending: Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Business Fixed Investment Spending: Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Business Fixed Investment Spending: Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Business Fixed Investment Spending: Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications
This network shows the impact of Business Fixed Investment Spending: Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Business Fixed Investment Spending: Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications.
About Business Fixed Investment Spending: Modeling Strategies, Empirical Results, and Policy Implications
This paper, published in 1992, received 560 indexed citations . Written by Bob Chirinko. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (430 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (266 citations) and Finance (209 citations). Published in Journal of Economic Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9712961.