Discovery of Multiple-Level Association Rules from Large Databases
- Authors
- Jiawei HanYongjian Fu
- Journal
- Very Large Data Bases
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9649795 →Countries where authors are citing Discovery of Multiple-Level Association Rules from Large Databases
This map shows the geographic impact of Discovery of Multiple-Level Association Rules from Large Databases. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Discovery of Multiple-Level Association Rules from Large Databases with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Discovery of Multiple-Level Association Rules from Large Databases more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Discovery of Multiple-Level Association Rules from Large Databases
This network shows the impact of Discovery of Multiple-Level Association Rules from Large Databases. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Discovery of Multiple-Level Association Rules from Large Databases.
About Discovery of Multiple-Level Association Rules from Large Databases
This paper, published in 1995, received 570 indexed citations . Written by Jiawei Han and Yongjian Fu covering the research area of Signal Processing, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (504 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (381 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (245 citations). Published in Very Large Data Bases.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9649795.