An efficient approach to clustering in large multimedia databases with noise

783 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1998, received 783 indexed citations. Written by Alexander Hinneburg and Daniel A. Keim covering the research area of Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (610 citations), Signal Processing (346 citations) and Information Systems (205 citations). Published in KOPS (University of Konstanz).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w9591193 →

Countries where authors are citing An efficient approach to clustering in large multimedia databases with noise

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of An efficient approach to clustering in large multimedia databases with noise. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by An efficient approach to clustering in large multimedia databases with noise with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites An efficient approach to clustering in large multimedia databases with noise more than expected).

Fields of papers citing An efficient approach to clustering in large multimedia databases with noise

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of An efficient approach to clustering in large multimedia databases with noise. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the An efficient approach to clustering in large multimedia databases with noise.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w9591193.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026