The social organization of sexuality : sexual practices in the United States

539 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1994, received 539 indexed citations. Written by Edward O. Laumann covering the research area of General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Social Psychology (209 citations), Clinical Psychology (208 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (179 citations). Published in DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w9512859 →

Countries where authors are citing The social organization of sexuality : sexual practices in the United States

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The social organization of sexuality : sexual practices in the United States. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The social organization of sexuality : sexual practices in the United States with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The social organization of sexuality : sexual practices in the United States more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The social organization of sexuality : sexual practices in the United States

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The social organization of sexuality : sexual practices in the United States. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The social organization of sexuality : sexual practices in the United States.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w9512859.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026