The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy

810 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2006, received 810 indexed citations. Written by Willem K. Brauers and Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas covering the research area of Management Science and Operations Research. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Management Science and Operations Research (503 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (167 citations) and Strategy and Management (138 citations). Published in Control and Cybernetics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w9380495 →

Countries where authors are citing The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The MOORA method and its application to privatization in a transition economy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w9380495.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026