Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg
- Authors
- Robert Lund
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9326595 →Countries where authors are citing Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg
This map shows the geographic impact of Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg
This network shows the impact of Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg.
About Identification and Inference for Econometric Models: Essays in Honor of Thomas Rothenberg
This paper, published in 2006, received 811 indexed citations . Written by Robert Lund. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (410 citations), Accounting (205 citations), Sociology and Political Science (154 citations), Finance (134 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (119 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9326595.