Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols.
Impact in
- Surgery 657
Classified as
- Journal
- PubMed
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9323164 →Countries where authors are citing Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols.
This map shows the geographic impact of Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols.. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols. more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols.
This network shows the impact of Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols.. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols..
About Pelvic ring disruptions: effective classification system and treatment protocols.
This paper, published in 1990, received 666 indexed citations . Written by Brian J. Eastridge, Todd Ellison, A Poka, G H Bathon and Robert J. Brumback covering the research area of Surgery. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Surgery (657 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (416 citations), Urology (124 citations), Emergency Medicine (63 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (21 citations). Published in PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9323164.