Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web
Impact in
Classified as
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9298896 →Countries where authors are citing Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web
This map shows the geographic impact of Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web
This network shows the impact of Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web.
About Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web
This paper, published in 2012, received 433 indexed citations . Written by Alain Mille, Fabien Gandon, Michael Rabinovich and Steffen Staab covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Artificial Intelligence (185 citations), Information Systems (151 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (131 citations), Sociology and Political Science (101 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (61 citations).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9298896.