Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry : fundamentals, instrumentation, and applications

637 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1997, received 637 indexed citations. Written by Richard B. Cole covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Spectroscopy (469 citations), Molecular Biology (153 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (137 citations). Published in Wiley eBooks.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w9291067 →

Countries where authors are citing Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry : fundamentals, instrumentation, and applications

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry : fundamentals, instrumentation, and applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry : fundamentals, instrumentation, and applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry : fundamentals, instrumentation, and applications more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry : fundamentals, instrumentation, and applications

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry : fundamentals, instrumentation, and applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry : fundamentals, instrumentation, and applications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w9291067.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026