Planck 2013 results - VII. HFI time response and beams
- Journal
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)
In The Last Decade
doi.org/w9159876 →Countries where authors are citing Planck 2013 results - VII. HFI time response and beams
This map shows the geographic impact of Planck 2013 results - VII. HFI time response and beams. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Planck 2013 results - VII. HFI time response and beams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Planck 2013 results - VII. HFI time response and beams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Planck 2013 results - VII. HFI time response and beams
This network shows the impact of Planck 2013 results - VII. HFI time response and beams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Planck 2013 results - VII. HFI time response and beams.
About Planck 2013 results - VII. HFI time response and beams
This paper, published in 2014, received 491 indexed citations . Written by P. A. R. Ade, N. Aghanim, C. Armitage-Caplan, M. Arnaud, M. Ashdown, F. Atrio‐Barandela, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi and A. J. Banday covering the research area of Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Aerospace Engineering and Astronomy and Astrophysics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Astronomy and Astrophysics (433 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (353 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (38 citations). Published in LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/w9159876.