Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence: Theory and Evidence

923 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1992, received 923 indexed citations. Written by Alex Cukierman covering the research area of General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Finance and Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (662 citations), Economics and Econometrics (640 citations) and Finance (568 citations). Published in RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.

In The Last Decade

doi.org/w9149473 →

Countries where authors are citing Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence: Theory and Evidence

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence: Theory and Evidence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence: Theory and Evidence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence: Theory and Evidence more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence: Theory and Evidence

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence: Theory and Evidence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Central Bank Strategy, Credibility, and Independence: Theory and Evidence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/w9149473.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026